An unfavorable decision has resulted from an individual rejecting unwanted sexual behavior. This situation describes which type of sexual harassment?

The situation described involves an unfavorable outcome that arises specifically from an individual rejecting unwanted sexual behavior, indicating a direct consequence of that rejection. This aligns with the definition of Quid Pro Quo sexual harassment, where a person in a position of power offers advancement or benefits in exchange for sexual favors. When the individual refuses these advances and subsequently faces negative repercussions, it exemplifies Quid Pro Quo.

In contrast, a Hostile Environment refers to a workplace culture that becomes intimidating or offensive due to pervasive unwanted behaviors of a sexual nature, but does not necessarily stem from a direct rejection of sexual advances. Retaliatory Harassment involves punishment or adverse actions taken against someone for reporting harassment or participating in an investigation, which is not the focus here. Nonverbal Harassment refers to actions that convey sexual innuendo or advances without verbal communication, but again, does not encapsulate the scenario where there are negative consequences for rejecting advances.

By understanding these distinctions, one can better recognize the nature of harassment in various contexts, particularly in relation to how power dynamics influence workplace interactions.