Discussing with a subordinate their failure to meet established standards and to develop improvement plans is referred to by what term?

The term that best describes the process of discussing a subordinate's failure to meet established standards and developing improvement plans is constructive feedback. This approach involves engaging in a dialogue that not only addresses the shortcomings but also focuses on how the individual can improve their performance moving forward.

Constructive feedback is essential in a leadership context as it promotes growth and development by identifying specific areas that need improvement while also providing support and resources to help the individual succeed. This method encourages open communication and a positive environment where employees feel comfortable seeking guidance.

Although performance evaluation, corrective action, and guidance session each have relevant aspects, they do not encapsulate the entire process as effectively. Performance evaluation usually refers to a formal assessment of an employee's overall job performance rather than a specific discussion about a failure to meet standards. Corrective action typically implies a more disciplinary approach rather than a supportive dialogue aimed at improvement. A guidance session could involve broader topics beyond performance issues and may not necessarily focus specifically on failures and improvement plans. Thus, constructive feedback aligns most closely with the described scenario.