On the E7 through E9 performance evaluation, which marks require substantiation in the comments block?

The correct response highlights the specific requirements for substantiating performance evaluation marks on the E7 through E9 evaluations. Substantiation is crucial for maintaining fairness and standards in performance assessments, and in this case, it is necessary to provide justification for lower performance marks that may indicate areas of significant concern.

In particular, all 1.0 marks, as well as three 2.0 marks and any 2.0 marks specifically indicated in block 37, require additional comments to clarify the context and provide constructive feedback. This ensures that there is a clear understanding of why a service member received these marks and allows for documented examples that can guide future performance improvements.

By requiring substantiation for these marks, it underscores the importance of being transparent about performance evaluations, especially in instances where an individual may not be meeting expected standards. It also emphasizes the role of leadership in mentoring and improving the performance of their personnel. Marking systems like these are structured to encourage growth and development, making it essential for evaluators to provide detailed feedback on lower scores.