On the E7 through E9 performance evaluation, which marks require substantiation in the comments block?

The correct answer highlights the specific requirements for substantiating certain marks on the E7 through E9 performance evaluation. In this context, substantiation refers to the need for additional comments to justify the marks given, which is crucial for ensuring clarity and transparency in evaluations.

For marks of 1.0, which generally indicate significant deficiencies in performance, it is imperative to provide context to understand the reasoning behind such a low score. Similarly, giving a mark of 2.0 in performance evaluations indicates that the individual is performing below expectations but may not necessarily warrant severe criticism, thus necessitating documentation in the comments section to clarify the nature of the performance issues. The specific mention of three 2.0 marks in block 37 indicates that consistent scoring at this level raises a critical need for explanation, as it can affect the overall assessment of an individual's capabilities.

This approach ensures that evaluators provide a thorough rationale for their marks, promoting accountability and enhancing the fairness of the performance evaluation process, particularly for those scoring at the lower end of the scale.