On the E7 through E9 performance evaluation, which marks require substantiation in the comments block?

The correct choice indicates that particular marks on the E7 through E9 performance evaluation require further clarification in the comments block. Specifically, all 1.0 marks necessitate substantiation due to their significant implication concerning unsatisfactory performance. Additionally, any three 2.0 marks must also be substantiated, as they point to performance that is noticeably below expectations but not failing, warranting explanation or context for the review board. The specification regarding the 2.0 marks in block 37 aligns with the evaluation acknowledging specific areas where improvement is necessary.

Substantiating these marks is crucial in providing a comprehensive understanding of the member's performance. It enables superiors and selection boards to grasp the rationale behind the rankings and focuses on the areas for development, promoting accountability and clarity in evaluations. Thus, the requirement for comments on these marks reflects the importance of detailed feedback in the military evaluation process, ensuring a foundation upon which performance discussions and future improvements can be built.