What should be excluded from a preliminary inquiry officer's report?

A preliminary inquiry officer's report serves a specific purpose in military investigations, primarily to assess whether there is sufficient evidence to proceed with further action, such as disciplinary measures or court-martial. The content of the report is crucial in maintaining an objective and impartial stance.

The recommended punishment is typically excluded from the report because it can imply bias or suggest a predetermined outcome. The role of the inquiry officer is to evaluate the evidence and present findings, not to advocate for specific outcomes or penalties. Including punishment recommendations could influence the decision-making process of the personnel responsible for determining consequences, potentially compromising fairness.

In contrast, findings of fact, witness statements, and summaries of evidence are all essential components of the report. They provide the necessary context, facts, and testimonies that support the investigation's findings, ensuring that the report remains a factual, unbiased document focused on the evidence and not on any punitive conclusions.