What type of marks on evaluations require detailed justification in comments?

The rationale for focusing on detailed justification in comments for all 1.0 marks and specific 2.0 marks stems from the seriousness of these ratings in performance evaluations. A mark of 1.0 signifies a significant deficiency in performance, indicating that the individual is not meeting the minimum standards expected for their position. Similarly, certain marks of 2.0 denote a failure to meet performance expectations, warranting explanation to clarify the reasons behind such evaluations.

Providing detailed justification for these low marks is essential as it helps ensure that the evaluation is fair, transparent, and constructive. It gives evaluators the opportunity to outline the specific areas where performance did not meet expectations and offers insights into whether there are underlying issues or trends that should be addressed. This type of detailed feedback is crucial in promoting professional development and improvement, allowing the individual being evaluated to understand the areas needing attention and potentially guiding them on their path toward better performance in the future.