When a complainant and alleged offender are assigned to different commands, a report of harassment must be processed by what authority?

The correct answer is that a report of harassment must be processed by the command of the alleged offender. When a situation involves harassment and the parties involved are from different commands, the responsibility for handling the report falls to the command of the individual accused of the offense. This ensures that the command directly responsible for the alleged offender is in charge of the investigation and outcome, allowing for accountability and due process that aligns with military regulations and procedures.

The rationale behind this protocol is focused on appropriate command jurisdiction and ensuring that the alleged offender's command can take necessary actions based on the findings of the investigation. This approach maintains the integrity of the process and ensures that the command with authority over the individual involved can implement any corrective measures or disciplinary actions, if warranted.

In scenarios involving different commands, the command of the complainant does not process the report, as they may lack the authority to investigate actions concerning another command's personnel. Similarly, the reporting officer and investigating officer commands do not hold the necessary jurisdiction in this context, as it is ultimately the responsibility of the command associated with the alleged offender to take action.