Which entry is considered inappropriate in Block 41 of a performance evaluation for a FCPO eligible for Chief?

The entry considered inappropriate in Block 41 of a performance evaluation for a First Class Petty Officer (FCPO) eligible for Chief is a Chief Warrant Officer. Block 41 is designated for the command's recommendation regarding a member's suitability for advancement to the rank of Chief Petty Officer. It reflects the evaluation of the FCPO against the Navy’s criteria for potential Chiefs.

A Chief Warrant Officer is not a rank that serves directly in the sequence of enlisted ratings leading to Chief Petty Officer. Including this rank would misrepresent the typical career path within the enlisted ranks and would not provide a relevant comparison for the FCPO’s performance.

In contrast, entries such as Senior Chief Petty Officer or Master Chief Petty Officer are appropriate, as they are senior enlisted ranks that can objectively assess the FCPO’s performance and potential for advancement. Similarly, a Lieutenant Commander, while being an officer rank, is still an appropriate comparison, as it is part of the broader leadership structure of the Navy. However, inserting a Chief Warrant Officer does not fit within the context of enlisted evaluations for promotion to Chief.