Which marks require substantiation in the comments block on the E7 through E9 performance evaluation?

The correct answer identifies all 2.0 marks and specifically notes the requirement for three 2.0 marks in block 37, which is a critical component of performance evaluations for personnel rated E7 through E9. The reason this answer is accurate is that the performance evaluation system aims for consistency and clarity in performance ratings. Lower marks indicate areas needing improvement, and substantiating comments provide context for those ratings.

By mandating substantiation for all 2.0 marks, the evaluation process ensures that evaluators give clear feedback and rationale for ratings that indicate significant deficiencies in a subordinate’s performance. The stipulation of commenting on three specific 2.0 marks in block 37 emphasizes accountability and improves the quality of the evaluation by addressing multiple instances of insufficient performance. This detailed feedback is designed to guide personnel in their professional development.

Higher marks or those above a 2.0 may not require such extensive substantiation since they generally reflect satisfactory or higher performance levels. Thus, while all marks can benefit from commentary for clarification, the standard specifically targets the 2.0 marks for additional scrutiny and detail to facilitate understanding and improvement.