Which of the following is NOT a typical consequence of a JAG investigation?

The correct answer is based on the understanding of the typical outcomes of a Judge Advocate General (JAG) investigation. JAG investigations primarily focus on legal matters related to military conduct, regulations, and adherence to the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).

Criminal charges may arise when an investigation finds sufficient evidence of a crime. This is a standard legal consequence of a JAG investigation, aimed at maintaining order and discipline within the military. Administrative action can also follow if misconduct is identified, allowing for non-criminal consequences such as reprimands, counseling, or other disciplinary measures.

Civil liabilities can be a factor, particularly if the investigation uncovers issues that lead to lawsuits or financial ramifications for service members or the military, making it a possible consequence of such proceedings.

In contrast, promotion recommendations are not a typical consequence of a JAG investigation. These investigations do not directly influence whether an individual is recommended for promotion; instead, they assess conduct and compliance with military law. The process of promotion recommendations is separate and focuses on an individual’s performance and qualifications, rather than the outcomes of legal investigations. Therefore, while outcomes of JAG investigations can impact a service member's career, they do not include promotion recommendations as a direct consequence.