Who is responsible for collecting all available facts concerning a potential Uniform Code of Military Justice offense?

The responsibility for collecting all available facts concerning a potential Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) offense typically falls to the Preliminary Inquiry Officer. This role is crucial as it involves gathering evidence, interviewing witnesses, and assembling pertinent information that will help determine whether there is enough basis to proceed with further actions, such as an investigation or charges.

The Preliminary Inquiry Officer's function is essential in ensuring that the command has a clear understanding of the circumstances surrounding the alleged offense. This prevents premature or unwarranted actions and ensures that due process is followed. By conducting a thorough inquiry, the officer helps maintain the integrity of the military justice system.

In contrast, while the Commanding Officer sets the overall direction and may be involved in decisions stemming from the inquiry, they do not typically conduct the fact-gathering themselves. The Judge Advocate General and Staff Judge Advocate provide legal advice and support to the command but are not directly involved in the preliminary fact-finding process. Their roles may come into play after the facts have been collected and analyzed.